
What one cannot ignore in the midst of this fast are the accusations that are flying between our leaders. The net of this falls wide, from Kapil Sibal, to forgotten Mister Lalu Prasad Yadav, from the pragmatic Modi to 'bhodrolok' Pranab babu. The parliament and the MMRDC maidan seem the same, a lot of noise, some speeches and a furious debate about a significant debate that (if it reaches a conclusion), could well shape the future of the biggest democracy of the world.
The fast, the deadlock, the debate, all boil down to just that word, Democracy. Is the fast anti constitutional, as it undermines the 'democratically elected' law making body? Are the demands of the Kejrival, Bhusans, Bedi and especially Anna not an effective exercise of their rights as a citizen of the country? How is the Lokpal or the Lokayukt, or whatever one may term it as, not a need of the Indian society today? Haven't the recent scams (2G scam, Commonwealth Scam, Adarsh Housing scam, and so many more) added to the need for a stronger body for checks, as is being demanded by the civil society?
The lokayukt or the Lokpal seems to be the Tendulkar of politics, someone who can take it to another level, but only if he/she has the powers. The powers will come from those who he will judge. So isn't this a catch 22 situation?
A country that is fighting for the lifting of the ban of the Gita in Russia, so that its culture is safeguarded needs a lesson in it, or so it would seem. It has been one where the King has been answerable not only the public but in the private sphere, where Sita was asked to leave as Ram's subject questioned her "purity". We seem to have reached a point where our "leaders" are not ready to accept public inputs in their workings (parliamentary debates and law making process), forget being answerable for any private undertakings.
